Analysis: Has the Post-Starmer Era Already Begun – Or Is Blairism Returning Through the Back Door?
A mayor who has yet to return to the House of Commons is behaving as though he is assembling Britain’s next government.
Current and former ministers are being discussed for cabinet posts that have not yet fallen vacant.
Old advisers are being summoned back to the centre of power.
Newspapers are spending more time speculating about the shape of the next government than analysing the current one.
All this while Keir Starmer remains prime minister.
Everyone appears to be standing over the corpse of a government that is still in office.
The paradox here is not simply one of temporary political weakness. It raises a more intriguing question.When does the post-leadership era actually begin?
And can power end politically before it ends formally?
In Britain today, many people appear to be acting as though the Starmer era is drawing to a close, even while its occupant remains in Downing Street.
When Leaders Lose Their Claim on the Future
In parliamentary systems, power is not defined solely by the ability to issue orders or command votes in the Commons.
It also rests on the ability to persuade others that you will still be there tomorrow.
That is why leaders rarely begin to fall on election day.
They begin to fall long before election day.
The process starts when ministers stop investing in their political futures alongside their leader.
When MPs begin looking for alternative alliances.When conversations behind closed doors shift from defending the government to imagining the next one.
Andy Burnham has yet to reclaim a parliamentary seat through the forthcoming by-election in Makerfield. Yet reports suggest he has already begun speaking to figures who could serve in a future cabinet.
Some newspapers speculate about a possible role for Ed Miliband at the Treasury.
Meanwhile, Morgan McSweeney, one of the principal architects of Starmer’s rise, has returned to the prime minister’s inner circle in an attempt to contain what may be the most serious internal threat Starmer has faced since entering Downing Street.
None of this necessarily means that Starmer’s political career is over.
The bloodless civil war taking shape within the governing Labour Party will determine that.
But it does suggest that many have begun preparing for the possibility that he may lose it.
Or at least, that they increasingly believe he might.
The Andy Burnham Paradox
Perhaps the most intriguing irony lies in the identity of the man increasingly discussed as Starmer’s potential successor.
Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, never presented himself as a new Tony Blair.
Quite the opposite.
He was often seen as closer to Labour’s grassroots, more attuned to questions of social justice and less attracted to the Blairite formula that reshaped the party during the 1990s.
But proximity to power changes people.
And sometimes it changes ideas.
The politician who built part of his reputation criticising Blair’s legacy now speaks of reforming welfare rather than expanding it.
He argues that Labour should not be embarrassed about reducing certain areas of public spending if necessary to strengthen defence, reassure markets and respond to warnings from the security establishment about an increasingly dangerous world.
To anyone familiar with the Blair years, the language sounds strikingly familiar.
And that is the paradox.
Can Labour Escape Blairism?
A quarter of a century after Tony Blair first entered Downing Street, Labour still seems to follow the same pattern.
It tries to escape Blairism whenever it sits in opposition.
Then, in varying forms, returns to it whenever power comes within reach.
In opposition, promises become bolder.
The rhetoric becomes more radical.
The distance from Blair’s legacy widens.
But as government approaches, the same questions inevitably return.
How do you reassure the markets?
How do you pay for defence?
How do you preserve the welfare state without losing economic credibility?
How do you convince sceptical voters that you can govern the country rather than merely dream of changing it?
Blairism increasingly resembles less a faction within Labour than a political centre of gravity, pulling the party back towards itself whenever power comes into view.
More Than a Leadership Crisis
Starmer may yet survive this moment.
Burnham may fail to convert the excitement surrounding his name into a coherent political project.
But the significance of today’s manoeuvring extends beyond the fate of either man. The question is no longer simply whether the post-Starmer era has begun. It is whether Labour can genuinely imagine a different route to power.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Burnham’s emergence is that the closer he appears to government, the less rebellious he seems towards Blair’s legacy—and the closer he moves towards it.
A quarter of a century after Blair arrived in Downing Street, Labour still appears trapped in the same cycle: rejecting Blairism in opposition, only to rediscover it on the threshold of power.
The question facing the party may no longer be who succeeds Keir Starmer. It may be whether Labour is capable of imagining any path to government other than the one Blair first mapped out.
Read more:
ShortURL ⬇
